Early access · The demo below is live
Carbon accounting software that starts from the invoices you already have.
Paste the spend data you already collect. Every line comes back classified to a GHG Protocol scope and Scope 3 category, with an audit trail from each number to its source.
Early access, launching soon · The demo runs on your data, ungated
Up to 40 lines. Processed to classify, never stored, never used to train anything.
Totals by scope
lines · factors ·
Scope 1 ·
Scope 2 ·
Scope 3 ·
Total CO2e
CO2e ·
Reduction planner · your run
Computed from your ledger. No benchmarks, no averages.
Scope 3 is of your estimate. Scope 3 is excluded from this run — lines deferred. This run found no Scope 3 lines to classify.
against this baseline
5%50%
= tCO2e to remove from a tCO2e baseline
Smallest set of sources that covers it
of your estimate — the smallest group that could absorb a cut on its own. of that group is spend-based, so the first move is supplier-specific factors for those vendors: a number that moves with invoice value cannot show a reduction you actually made. Only of that group is spend-based, so most of the target is already measured against activity data and a reduction there will show up as a real one. None of that group is spend-based — it is measured against activity data end to end, so a reduction there will show up as a real one.
Drafted basis-of-preparation note
Screening estimate. Spend-based method with model-selected emission factors. Suitable for finding hotspots and scoping a real inventory. Not audit-grade and not a substitute for a verified GHG inventory.
Why this exists
The first mandatory reporting year finds the same three problems
CSRD, CBAM, California SB 253 or one big customer's questionnaire: whichever lands first, the discovery is identical.
01
Nobody owns the number
Emissions data lives in AP invoices, fuel cards, utility bills, travel bookings and ERP exports. No single person can produce a Scope 3 figure, because no single system holds one.
02
Scope 3 is most of the footprint
Scope 3 emissions are typically 70 to 90% of the total and all of the pain: fifteen categories, most of which must be estimated from spend before anyone can justify collecting activity data.
03
The default fix goes stale
A consulting engagement produces a static spreadsheet and a PDF that is out of date the quarter it lands, with no trail from a reported tonne back to the invoice that produced it.
The bottleneck is not the arithmetic. It is classification and evidence: which line is Scope 1, which Scope 3 category it belongs to, which factor applies, and how you prove that choice to an auditor eighteen months later.
Outcomes, not dashboards
A classified, evidence-linked emissions ledger
Start from data you already have
The accounts-payable export your ERP produces today is enough for a complete first screening. AI drafts a GHG Protocol classification for every line, with its confidence stated, and a human reviews instead of typing. That pass is exactly what the demo above just ran.
15
Scope 3 categories, handled
Every value-chain line lands in one of the 15 categories without a data team.
Every number has a source
A reported tonne resolves to the invoice line, the factor and the method behind it. The audit trail exists before the auditor does.
A disclosure note, drafted
The basis-of-preparation note nobody wants to write, drafted in CSRD ESRS E1 register alongside the numbers it describes.
Honest about precision
Spend-based screening is labelled spend-based screening. Confidence is per line, and the upgrade path to activity data is part of the output, not an apology.
Accounting, not dashboards
Import. Classify. Close the ledger.
The workflow is deliberately shaped like month-end close, because that is the discipline a defensible number needs.
Step 01
Import what exists
Drop in the AP or ERP export, utility bills and fuel-card statements. No questionnaires, no retyping. CSV in, ledger out.
Step 02
AI classifies, you review
Every line gets a scope, a Scope 3 category, a factor and a stated confidence. You review the low-confidence tail; the decision stays on the record.
Step 03
Export the closing pack
Totals by scope and category, the evidence-linked ledger, and the drafted basis-of-preparation note, ready for a disclosure draft or a customer request.
Published, unlike anyone else's
Planned pricing, on the page
Every incumbent in this category sells behind a sales call. Our planned pricing is public, and nothing is charged during early access.
Ledger
$390/mo
First reporting year, one entity
Scope 1 + 2 + spend-based Scope 3 screening, evidence links, 3 seats.
Compliance
$1,290/mo
In scope for CSRD, CBAM or SB 253
Activity factors, supplier requests, E1/CBAM/ISSB packs, audit log, 10 seats.
Assurance
$3,900/mo
Facing third-party assurance
Multi-entity consolidation, method history, assurance workspace, unlimited seats.
Enterprise
Custom
Group, multi-entity, regulated
SSO/SAML + SCIM, approval workflows, 99.9% SLA, EU residency, named engineer.
Planned pricing at launch. Nothing is charged today. Requesting access adds you to the early-access list; there is no card field, no checkout, and no obligation. Yearly billing is planned at roughly 20% off. Full tier detail on the pricing page.
For the CFO signing off on the number
Three questions decide whether the number you sign is defensible
Where did this tonne come from?
Every posting links to its source line. The answer to an auditor's sample is a click, not an archaeology project across old spreadsheets.
Who approved this factor?
Factor choices and overrides are recorded events with owners. Maker-checker approval on posting changes is designed in, not retrofitted.
Can you reproduce last year's number after the method changed?
Methods and factor sets are versioned, and restatements are explicit events with reasons. The trend line survives methodology improvements.
Sustainability disclosure is moving into the regime financial disclosure already lives in: assured, restated when wrong, and signed by someone. The whole argument, including the ROI conversation without invented numbers, is on enterprise carbon accounting.
Asked before giving us an email
The questions that decide the signup
01 Is this live yet?
02 Is the demo's number audit-grade?
03 What standards does it follow?
04 Where does my pasted data go?
05 What happens after I give you my email?
See your own footprint classified in about a minute.
Run the live demo on a sample or on your own spend lines. If it earns it, request early access.